Post by account_disabled on Feb 20, 2024 5:41:35 GMT -5
readers receive. 2020 has been crazy and the media often doesn't know how to cover everything that's going on. Topics such as COVID-19, racism, global warming and corruption are addressed in a biased way, favoring polarization (especially political). Many vehicles adopt groupthink by insisting that they are not biased. Journalists say things like "we don't focus on one side of the story or the other, we just bring the information to the people ." Crap! Reporting from “neutral territory” on a relevant topic is irresponsible and disrespectful to
readers. We cannot talk about journalistic objectivity or impartiality using only a spectrum with two opposite sides. Not all the news in a newspaper can be classified like this. You have to have a more refined journalistic perspective . What we can do then is create a somewhat more robust Rich People Phone Number List
news rating system, as media analyst Thomas Baekdal suggests . First we define whether we are talking about opinions or facts . Up to this point, newspapers have a relatively easy time classifying their content (although they sometimes continue to confuse them). Then we create another spectrum in which we define whether or not something is a problem . In other words, it is not a question of whether people believe it is a problem, but whether journalistic verification shows that it is a problem.
By combining these two spectra we can format a matrix: News classification matrix News classification matrix The role of journalists is to fit each story into a quadrant. Let's look at each of them a little: Fact-based problems First of all, we have the upper right quadrant, where are all the topics that are defined as problems and that are also based on real facts and data . We can fit corruption in Brazil, for example, into this quadrant. News classification matrix Corruption is a real problem Because? Journalists must investigate. I, who am not a journalist, researching on the Transparency International portal found Brazil in position 106
readers. We cannot talk about journalistic objectivity or impartiality using only a spectrum with two opposite sides. Not all the news in a newspaper can be classified like this. You have to have a more refined journalistic perspective . What we can do then is create a somewhat more robust Rich People Phone Number List
news rating system, as media analyst Thomas Baekdal suggests . First we define whether we are talking about opinions or facts . Up to this point, newspapers have a relatively easy time classifying their content (although they sometimes continue to confuse them). Then we create another spectrum in which we define whether or not something is a problem . In other words, it is not a question of whether people believe it is a problem, but whether journalistic verification shows that it is a problem.
By combining these two spectra we can format a matrix: News classification matrix News classification matrix The role of journalists is to fit each story into a quadrant. Let's look at each of them a little: Fact-based problems First of all, we have the upper right quadrant, where are all the topics that are defined as problems and that are also based on real facts and data . We can fit corruption in Brazil, for example, into this quadrant. News classification matrix Corruption is a real problem Because? Journalists must investigate. I, who am not a journalist, researching on the Transparency International portal found Brazil in position 106
